Date: 12/18/2011, 5:11 pm
: Why is your spreadsheet not precise enough ?
: If you want inches in your spreadsheet, or on a calculator, just
: multiply decimal feet X 12 and you will have inches plus tenth's
: Use an Imperial ruler that is in tenths and you will be fine. You
: will normally find tenths(1/10) on the same ruler as
: sixteenths(1/16).
: Example = .780 decimal feet X 12 = 9.36 inches. Round up to 9.4in
: if you wish as that's accurate enough for making SOF cross
: sections.
: Assuming .780 is in cell B8, then the formula is =SUM(B8*12)
: Otherwise, just use the metric offsets provided for the Sea Bee and
: use a metric ruler. I show the offsets in centimeters, but
: millimeters
: are simply a matter of moving the decimal point one place to the
: right.
: Metric is a very precise / accurate way to go about this.
: 2.54cm or 25.4mm = 1 inch.
: .780 decimal feet X 12 X 2.54cm = 23.77cm or 237.7mm ... round up
: to 238mm
: .780 decimal feet X 12 X 25.4mm = 237.7mm
: Assuming .780 is in cell B8, then the formula is =SUM(B8*12*25.4)
: I use an old version of Excel, so the formula's may be setup
: differently in later versions.
: Good luck with the Sea Bee :)
Thanks everyone. After weighing all the suggestions I'm going to try a few different things. 1) I just ordered a metric ruler and 2) I'm altering my spreadsheet to covert to 1/16ths. After finishing my Chuckanut 12 next week, I'm starting on the Sea Bee.
Thanks again.
Jim
Messages In This Thread
- Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
james Adams -- 12/17/2011, 10:24 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
ancient kayaker -- 12/18/2011, 12:17 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Bill Hamm -- 12/18/2011, 1:49 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Yostwerks -- 12/18/2011, 2:45 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
james Adams -- 12/18/2011, 5:11 pm
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Etienne Muller -- 12/18/2011, 6:48 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
daan daniels -- 12/18/2011, 6:51 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Etienne Muller -- 12/18/2011, 7:16 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Reg Lake -- 12/18/2011, 11:34 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Etienne Muller -- 12/18/2011, 2:29 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Mike Savage -- 12/19/2011, 5:19 pm - Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Glenn -- 12/18/2011, 1:02 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Etienne Muller -- 12/18/2011, 2:31 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Paul G. Jacobson -- 12/18/2011, 2:38 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
les cheeseman -- 12/18/2011, 3:10 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Etienne Muller -- 12/18/2011, 4:23 pm
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Matthias -- 12/18/2011, 4:30 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Rob -- 12/19/2011, 7:46 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
ancient kayaker -- 12/19/2011, 9:57 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Matthias -- 12/20/2011, 6:01 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Etienne Muller -- 12/20/2011, 6:18 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
ancient kayaker -- 12/20/2011, 11:02 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Will N 2 Go -- 12/20/2011, 6:23 pm
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Thomas Duncan -- 12/18/2011, 11:34 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Kevin McAtee -- 12/20/2011, 6:28 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
Bill Hamm -- 12/21/2011, 2:16 am
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Decimal conversions