Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
By:Tony G
Date: 5/5/2013, 4:29 pm
Date: 5/5/2013, 4:29 pm
In Response To: S&G: What would be lighter? (Sodbuster------WebKitFormBoundary6pLaVD9X7Zfw4+Pi-)
If you don't insist on preserving the natural wood color of the plywood, S-glass is another option.
S-glass is substantially stronger than the typically used E-glass. The disadvantage is that due to very tight weave it is difficult to wet-out clearly. You could use 6-oz S-glass on the outside of the hull, then paint it.
4-oz E-glass on the outside deck should be strong enough. This combination would probably result in a very lightweight, but reasonably strong boat.
Messages In This Thread
- S&G: What would be lighter?
Sodbuster------WebKitFormBoundary6pLaVD9X7Zfw4+Pi- -- 5/4/2013, 1:13 pm- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
JohnAbercrombie -- 5/4/2013, 11:00 pm- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
JohnAbercrombie -- 5/4/2013, 11:06 pm- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
JohnAbercrombie -- 5/4/2013, 11:09 pm- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
ancient kayaker -- 5/5/2013, 10:36 am- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
Sodbuster------WebKitFormBoundary6pLaVD9X7Zfw4+Pi- -- 5/5/2013, 12:24 pm- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
Bill Hamm -- 5/6/2013, 12:36 am
- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
Tony G -- 5/5/2013, 4:29 pm- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
Sodbuster------WebKitFormBoundary6pLaVD9X7Zfw4+Pi- -- 5/5/2013, 5:21 pm
- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?
- Re: S&G: What would be lighter?