Heh heh, but that would be too similar to the guillemot 'cockpit apron' and thereby be unpatentable.
I pointed out the similarity to the patent holder in our discussions. He said his patent was different and pointed to the pictures. Unfortunately, what matter is what is written in the patent claim. The words are what defines the patent.
If you read the claim of the patent below, my style apron is covered by the patent.
1. A cockpit system for a kayak having a deck and a cockpit opening defined in the deck, the cockpit system comprising:
bow and stern deck portions forming the deck, where
the cockpit opening is formed in the bow deck portion, and
a deck gap region is formed between the bow deck portion and the stern deck portion;
a coaming assembly that extends around the cockpit opening; and
a transition member arranged between the bow deck portion and the stern deck portion, where the transition member is sized and dimensioned to fill the deck gap region; wherein
the bow deck portion adjacent to the transition member is lower than the stern deck portion adjacent to the transition member under normal use of the kayak.
Using the photo of my S&G Guillemot below as a reference, take a look at the patent claim piece by piece:
1. A cockpit system for a kayak having a deck and a cockpit opening defined in the deck,
S&G Guillemot has a deck and a cockpit opening defined in the deck.
a) the cockpit system comprises:bow and stern deck portions forming the deck, where the cockpit opening is formed in the bow deck portion, and a deck gap region is formed between the bow deck portion and the stern deck portion;
S&G Guillemot has a bow deck and with a separation between it and the stern deck. The cockpit opening is formed in the deck. There is a gap region between the bow deck and the stern deck.
b) a coaming assembly that extends around the cockpit opening;
S&G Guillemot exhibits a coaming assembly around the cockpit opening.
c) a transition member arranged between the bow deck portion and the stern deck portion, where the transition member is sized and dimensioned to fill the deck gap region
S&G Guillemot exhibits a transition member between a stern deck and a bow deck portion. This member fills the gap between the bow deck and stern deck.
d) the bow deck portion adjacent to the transition member is lower than the stern deck portion adjacent to the transition member under normal use of the kayak
S&G Guillemot exhibits a deck adjacent to the stern deck that transitions lower than the stern deck.
There are lots of kayaks that existed before the patent application where you can take the patent claims piece by piece and see that they fit easily. This is why the patent does not provide the protection the patent holder wanted when he spent the money for the patent.
Messages In This Thread
- S&G: first multi-chine kayak
warren williamson -- 8/17/2015, 10:41 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Etienne Muller -- 8/18/2015, 3:44 am- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak *PIC*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 8/18/2015, 8:12 am- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Justin -- 8/18/2015, 10:38 am- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Dan Caouette (CSCWC) -- 8/18/2015, 11:04 am- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Victor -- 8/18/2015, 11:41 am- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
warren williamson -- 8/18/2015, 12:17 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Justin -- 8/18/2015, 1:36 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
bsoderholm -- 8/18/2015, 3:08 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Justin -- 8/18/2015, 3:57 pm
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Bill Hamm -- 8/18/2015, 10:19 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Pete -- 8/18/2015, 11:00 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Jay babina -- 10/20/2015, 11:43 am- Patent Foolishness
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 10/21/2015, 11:21 am
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Patent 6779477 *PIC*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 8/19/2015, 8:48 am- Re: Patent 6779477
Bill Hamm -- 8/19/2015, 5:07 pm- Re: Patent 6779477
Bill Hamm -- 10/20/2015, 3:26 am- Re: Patent 6779477
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 10/20/2015, 9:59 am- Re: Patent 6779477
Bill Hamm -- 10/20/2015, 2:00 pm- Re: Patent 6779477
Björn Thomasson -- 11/1/2017, 6:03 pm
- Re: Patent 6779477
- Re: Patent 6779477
- Re: Patent 6779477
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Pygmy Recessed Ckpt Patent
mick allen -- 8/18/2015, 7:02 pm- Re: Pygmy Recessed Ckpt Patent
warren williamson -- 8/19/2015, 1:15 am- Recessed Ckpt Patent: the Guy
mick allen -- 8/19/2015, 3:47 am- Re: Pygmy Recessed Ckpt Patent
Bill Hamm -- 8/19/2015, 5:12 pm- Re: Pygmy Recessed Ckpt Patent
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 8/20/2015, 8:15 am - Re: Pygmy Recessed Ckpt Patent
- Re: Pygmy Recessed Ckpt Patent *PIC*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 8/19/2015, 8:56 am- Re: Pygmy Recessed Ckpt Patent
Rod Tait -- 8/19/2015, 11:37 am- Re: Pygmy Recessed Ckpt Patent
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 8/19/2015, 1:04 pm- Re: Patents
Rod Tait -- 8/19/2015, 8:17 pm- Re: Patents
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 8/20/2015, 10:22 am- Re: Patents
Daniel Thaler -- 8/20/2015, 12:58 pm- Re: Patents
warren williamson -- 8/20/2015, 2:39 pm
- Re: Patents
Dan Caouette (CSCWC) -- 8/20/2015, 3:52 pm- Re: Patents
Rod Tait -- 8/20/2015, 4:40 pm- Re: Patents
Bill Hamm -- 8/20/2015, 5:46 pm- Re: Patents
Shawn Jones -- 8/26/2015, 4:34 am- Re: Patents *PIC*
Shawn Jones -- 8/26/2015, 4:59 am
- Re: Patents *PIC*
Dan Thaler -- 10/11/2015, 6:47 pm - Re: Patents
- Re: Patents
Alex Ferguson -- 11/2/2017, 6:20 am- Re: Patents
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 11/2/2017, 10:20 am- Re: Patents
JohnAbercrombie -- 11/2/2017, 11:01 am
- Re: Patents
- Re: Patents
- Re: Patents
- Re: Patents
- Re: Pygmy Recessed Ckpt Patent
mick allen -- 8/19/2015, 10:11 pm - Re: Pygmy Recessed Ckpt Patent
- Recessed Ckpt Patent: the Guy
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Brian Nystrom -- 8/19/2015, 7:30 am- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
daan Daaniels -- 10/18/2015, 2:53 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
daan Daniels -- 10/18/2015, 2:55 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Marc Upchurch -- 10/18/2015, 3:44 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak *PIC*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 10/18/2015, 8:56 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Björn Thomasson -- 11/1/2017, 6:44 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
mick allen -- 11/1/2017, 7:41 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Björn Thomasson -- 11/2/2017, 4:15 am- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 11/2/2017, 8:36 am- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
mick allen -- 11/3/2017, 10:40 pm
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Letters from Attorneys
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 11/2/2017, 9:14 am- Re: Letters from Attorneys
M A Bielski -- 11/3/2017, 7:55 am- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 11/3/2017, 9:19 am- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
JohnAbercrombie -- 11/3/2017, 12:26 pm- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 11/3/2017, 5:01 pm- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
JohnAbercrombie -- 11/3/2017, 5:19 pm- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
JohnAbercrombie -- 11/3/2017, 5:21 pm- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
M A Bielski -- 11/3/2017, 11:40 pm- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
Etienne Muller -- 11/4/2017, 6:26 pm
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
Jay Babina -- 11/4/2017, 7:33 pm- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
JohnAbercrombie -- 11/4/2017, 8:24 pm- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 11/4/2017, 11:17 pm- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark *PIC*
Etienne Muller -- 11/5/2017, 3:50 am- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
Etienne Muller -- 11/5/2017, 3:54 am- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
Paul Sylvester -- 11/5/2017, 5:00 am- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark, names
JohnAbercrombie -- 11/5/2017, 4:40 pm- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark, names
JohnAbercrombie -- 11/5/2017, 4:49 pm
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark, names
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 11/5/2017, 8:54 am- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
Jay Babina -- 11/5/2017, 6:35 pm
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
- Re: Patent vs Trade Mark
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Bill Hamm -- 11/2/2017, 9:10 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Bill Hamm -- 11/2/2017, 9:37 pm - Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
LeeG -- 10/19/2015, 5:35 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
mick allen -- 10/20/2015, 1:26 am- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak *PIC*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 10/20/2015, 11:00 am- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak *PIC*
mick allen -- 10/20/2015, 8:28 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak *PIC*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 10/20/2015, 9:56 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
mick allen -- 10/21/2015, 4:06 pm
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
mick allen -- 10/31/2017, 1:48 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 10/31/2017, 6:03 pm- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
mick allen -- 10/31/2017, 7:32 pm
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak *PIC*
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak *PIC*
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak *PIC*
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak *PIC*
- Re: S&G: first multi-chine kayak