Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
In Response To: Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question (Rich Wagner)
You might think about keeping the deck stringer all the way to the bow, just lower the height below the gunwales.
That way the stiffness at the bow will not be reduced but you still get the flat deck.
One of the things the stringers do is to stabilize the frames - in this case the #1 frame.
My guess is that what you said will work because the gunwales are large and the width at #1 is more narrow, but it would just be "more" safe with a complete deck stringer.
Of course, who wants to be so safe you completely waste the chance to reduce the weight some?
Let us know what you find out during the build and paddling.
Messages In This Thread
- Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Rich Wagner -- 2/26/2016, 2:32 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Marc Upchurch -- 2/26/2016, 4:18 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Bill Hamm -- 2/28/2016, 12:18 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Rich Wagner -- 2/28/2016, 2:54 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Marc Upchurch -- 2/28/2016, 5:02 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Rich Wagner -- 2/28/2016, 6:16 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Marc Upchurch -- 2/28/2016, 8:01 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Bill Hamm -- 2/29/2016, 12:25 am - Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
T Duncan -- 2/28/2016, 10:58 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Marc Upchurch -- 2/28/2016, 1:26 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question *PIC*
T Duncan -- 2/29/2016, 10:59 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
T Duncan -- 2/29/2016, 11:06 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question *PIC*
T Duncan -- 2/29/2016, 11:14 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Marc Upchurch -- 2/29/2016, 8:26 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
T Duncan -- 2/29/2016, 9:19 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Marc Upchurch -- 2/29/2016, 9:50 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Rich Wagner -- 2/29/2016, 10:17 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Marc Upchurch -- 3/1/2016, 8:19 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Rich Wagner -- 3/1/2016, 9:13 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Rich Wagner -- 3/1/2016, 9:18 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Rich Wagner -- 3/1/2016, 4:10 pm
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Bill Hamm -- 3/1/2016, 12:23 am - Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Marc Upchurch -- 2/29/2016, 8:22 pm - Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question *PIC*
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question *PIC*
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Marc Upchurch -- 2/28/2016, 5:06 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
Bill Hamm -- 2/29/2016, 12:28 am
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: fuselage rocker question